Image 1 of 1: ‘X-ray image creation schematic.’
Schematic of x-ray image creation.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Knee series.’
image
courtesy of Radiopaedia, author and ID on image
Image 1 of 1: ‘Fluorsocopy.’
image courtesy of
Ptrump16, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 , via
Wikimedia Commons
Image 1 of 1: ‘Graph of sinogram and processed images.’
singogram and processed images.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Mitral valve prolapse.’
Image of mitral valve prolapse from Cafer
Zorkun, MD, PhD on wikidoc.org with creative commons lisence.
Image 1 of 1: ‘K-space.’
k-space image.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Graph of k space and processed images.’
K space and processed images.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Nuclear Medicine Image.’
Nuclear medicine image.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Pathology Image.’
Pathology image.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Nipreps chart’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Arrays’
Image 1 of 1: ‘MRI slices’
Image 1 of 1: ‘T1 weighted’
Image 1 of 1: ‘flipped images’
Image 1 of 1: ‘SITK logo.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘SITK Image.’
An image in SITK occupies a region in physical
space which is defined by its meta-data (origin, size, spacing, and
direction cosine matrix). Note that the image’s physical extent starts
half a voxel before the origin and ends half a voxel beyond the last
voxel.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Isotropic vs non-isotropic images.’
The same image displayed with a viewer that is
not aware of spatial meta-data (left image) and one that is aware (right
image). The image’s pixel spacing is (0.97656, 2.0)mm.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Spatial relationship in images.’
Two images with exactly the same pixel data,
positioned in the world coordinate system. In SITK these are not
considered the same image, because they occupy different spatial
locations.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Slice and cmaps example.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Multiple slices example.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Operations examples.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Slice with grid mask.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Digital x-ray image.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Grayscale x-ray image.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Non-isotropic slices example.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘CT and MRI volumes before being aligned.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘CT and MRI volumes overimposed.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Metrics across iterations.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘CT and MRI volumes aligned.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘T1 MRI scan, Z slices.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Basic thresholding methods.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Brain lateral ventricle.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Initial seed.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Region growing segmentations.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Confidence connected after morphological closing.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Level-set segmentation.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Y-axis segmentation.’
Image 1 of 1: ‘CXR examples’
Image 1 of 1: ‘augmented chest x-ray different sizes’
Image 1 of 1: ‘augmented chest x-ray’
Image 1 of 1: ‘augmented by shear chest x-ray’
Image 1 of 1: ‘augmented by waves chest x-ray’
Image 1 of 1: ‘T1 v T3’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Gross and histopathology’
Image 1 of 1: ‘ Thumbnail histopathology’
Image 1 of 2: ‘ File structures’
Image 2 of 2: ‘ Pyramidal histopathology’
Pyramidal file structure and tiling are quite challenging to
understand, and different file formats can actually implement the
concepts a bit differently. Pyramids are actually a more general concept
in image processing. The key concept about them to understand are that a
pyramidal image simply represents the image at multiple scales, and that
could be implemented in many different ways. Usually we don’t create
such pyramids by hand, but rather, you guessed it, algorithmically with
code. The pictures below illustrate the concepts involved in tiled
pyramical images.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Identifiable ultrasound’
Image from flikr website published with a
permissive lisence.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Non-Identifiable blurred ultrasound’
Image after blurring in one area.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Non-Identifiable masked ultrasound’
Image after masking in one area.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Non-Identifiable cropped ultrasound’
Image after crop and resize.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Non-Identifiable head’
Images of SITK head.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Home-made deface’
Our partial soft tissue stripping.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Home-made deface by grow from seed’
Our grown from seed soft tissue stripping.
Image 1 of 1: ‘Defacing examples’
Image from “A reproducibility evaluation of the
effects of MRI defacing on brain segmentation” by Chenyu Gao, Bennett A.
Landman, Jerry L. Prince, and Aaron Carass. The preprint is available
here .
Image 1 of 1: ‘jewlery artifact’
Image 1 of 1: ‘Misled image’
Image generated by Dr. Candace Makeda Moore
prompting
Adobe
Firely .
Image 1 of 1: ‘Misled image of cats’
Image generated by Dr. Candace Makeda Moore
prompting
Adobe
Firely .