OverviewTeaching: 20 min
Exercises: 0 minQuestions
What is a Graphics Processing Unit?
Can a GPU be used for anything else than graphics?
Are GPUs faster than CPUs?Objectives
Learn how a GPU works
Understand the differences between CPU and GPU
Graphics Processing Unit
The Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) is one of the components of a computer’s video card, together with specialized memory and different Input/Output (I/O) units. In the context of the video card, the GPU fulfills a role similar to the one that the Central Processing Unit (CPU) has in a general purpose computing system: it processes input data data to generate some kind of output. In the traditional context of video cards, GPUs process data in order to render images on an output device, such as a screen or monitor. However, current GPUs are general purpose computing devices able to perform any kind of computation.
Parallel by Design
But what is the reason to use GPUs to perform general purpose computation, when computers already have fast CPUs that are able to perform any kind of computation? One way to answer this question is to go back to the roots of what a GPU is designed to do.
An image can be seen as a matrix of points called pixels (a portmanteau of the words picture and element), with each pixel representing the color the image should have in that particular point, and the traditional task performed by video cards is to produce the images a user will see on the screen. So GPUs are designed with this particular task in mind: render multiple pixels at the same time.
A single 4K UHD image contains more than 8 million pixels. If a GPU needs to generate a continuous stream of 25 4K frames (images) per second, enough for a user to not experience delays in a videogame, movie, or any other video output, it must process over 200 million pixels per second. So GPUs are not only designed to render multiple pixels at the same time, they are designed to do it efficiently.
This design principle results in the GPU being, from a hardware point of view, a very different device than a CPU. The CPU is a very general purpose device, good at different tasks, being them parallel or sequential in nature; it is also designed for interaction with the user, so it has to be responsive and guarantee minimal latency. The result is a device where most of the silicon is used for memory caches and control-flow logic, not just compute units. By contrast, most of the silicon on a GPU is actually used for compute units.
The GPU does not need an overly complicated cache hierarchy, nor it does need complex control logic, because the overall goal is not to minimize the latency of any given thread, but to maximize the throughput of the whole computation. With many compute units available, the GPU can run massively parallel programs, programs in which thousands of threads are executed at the same time, while thousands more are ready for execution to hide the cost of memory operations.
So, GPUs are massively parallel devices that can execute thousands of threads at the same time. But what does it mean in practice for the user? Why anyone would need to use a GPU to compute something that can be easily computed on a CPU? We begin with an example: sorting a large array in Python.
First we need to create an array of random single precision floating point numbers.
import numpy as np size = 4096 * 4096 input = np.random.random(size).astype(np.float32)
We then time the execution of the NumPy
sort() function, to see how long sorting this array takes on the CPU.
%timeit output = np.sort(input)
While the timing of this operation will differ depending on the system on which you run the code, these are the results for one experiment running on a Jupyter notebook on Google Colab.
1 loop, best of 5: 1.84 s per loop
We now perform the same sorting operation, but this time we will be using CuPy to execute the
sort() on the GPU.
CuPy is an open-source library, compatible with NumPy, for GPU computing in Python.
import cupy as cp input_gpu = cp.asarray(input) %timeit output_gpu = cp.sort(input_gpu)
We also report the output, obtained on the same notebook on Google Colab; as always note that your result will vary based on the environment and GPU you are using.
100 loops, best of 5: 6.83 ms per loop
Sorting an array using CuPy, and therefore the GPU, is clearly much faster than using NumPy; but how much faster? Having recorded the average execution time of both operations, we can then compute the speedup of using CuPy over NumPy. The speedup is defined as the ratio between the sequential (NumPy in our case) and parallel (CuPy in our case) execution time; beware that both execution times need to be in the same unit, this is why we had to convert the GPU execution time from milliseconds to seconds.
1.84 / 0.00683
With the result of the previous operation being the following.
We can therefore say that by using the GPU with CuPy for our
sort() operation we obtained a speedup of 269, or simply put an improvement in performance of 269 times.