This lesson is still being designed and assembled (Pre-Alpha version)

Structural MRI (Pre)processing and Neuroimaging Analysis

sMRI Acquisition and Modalities

Overview

Teaching: 20 min
Exercises: 10 min
Questions
  • How is a structural MR image acquired?

  • What anatomical features do different modalities capture?

Objectives
  • Visualize and understand differences in T1,T2,PD/FLAIR weighted images.

You Are Here!

course_flow

Image acquisition

  1. The acquisition starts with application of strong magnetic field B0 (e.g. 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla > 10000x earth’s magnetic field) which forces the hydrogen nuclei of the abundant water molecules in soft tissues in the body to align with the field. You can think of hydrogen nuclei as tiny magnets of their own.

  2. Then the scanner applies a radio-frequency (RF) (i.e. excitation) pulse which tilts these nuclei from their alignment along B0. The nuclei then precess back to the alignment. The precessing nuclei emit a signal, which is registered by the receiver coils in the scanner.

  3. This signal has two components: 1) Longitudinal (z-axis along the scanner’s magnetic field) and 2) Transverse (xy-plane orthogonal to the scanner’s magnetic field).

  4. Initially the longitudinal signal is weak as most nuclei are tilted away from the z-axis. However this signal grows as nuclei realign. The time constant that dictates the speed of re-alignment is denoted by T1.

  5. Initially the transverse signal is strong as most nuclei are in phase coherence. The signal decays as the nuclei dephase as they realign. This decay is denoted by the T2 time constant.

  6. The tissue specific differences in T1 and T2 relaxation times is what enables us to see anatomy from image contrast. The final image contrast depends on when you listen to the signal (design parameter: echo time (TE)) and how fast you repeat the tilt-relax process i.e. RF pulse frequency (design parameter: repetition time (TR)).

T1 and T2 relaxation

Here we see signal from two different tissues as the nuclei are tilted and realigned. The figure on the left shows a single nucleus (i.e. tiny magnet) being tilted away and then precessing back to the the initial alighment along B0. The figure on the right shows the corresponding registered T1 and T2 signal profiles for two different “tissues”. The difference in their signal intensities results in the image contrast.

MR_relax

Brain tissue comparison

The dotted-black line represents the epoch when you “listen” to the signal (i.e. echo time or TE).

relax_tissue_contrast)

T1w, T2w, and PD acquisition

  TE short TE long (~ T2 of tissue of interest)
TR short (~ T1 of tissue of interest) T1w -
TR long Proton Density (PD) T2w

Note: More recently, the FLAIR (Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery) sequence has replaced the PD image. FLAIR images are T2-weighted with the CSF signal suppressed.

pulse sequence parameters and image contrast

What are the two basic pulse sequence parameters that impact T1w and T2w image contrasts? Which one is larger?

Solution

Repetition time (TR) and echo time (TE) are the two pulse sequence parameters that dictate the T1w and T2w image contrasts. TR > TE.

T1 and T2 relaxation times for various tissues

  T1 (ms) T2 (ms)
Bones 500 50
CSF 4000 500
Grey Matter 1300 110
White Matter 800 80

Tissue type and image contrast

In the T1w image, which one is brighter: White matter, Grey Matter, or CSF?

Solution

White Matter (i.e. axonal tracts)

T1w, T2w image contrasts

T1w T2w
T1 T2

Applications per modality

Modality Contrast Characteristics Use Cases
T1w Cerebrospinal fluid is dark Quantifying anatomy e.g. measure structural volumes
T2w CSF is light, but white matter is darker than with T1 Identify pathologies related to lesions and tumors
PD CSF is bright. Gray matter is brighter than white matter Identify demyelination
FLAIR Similar to T2 with the CSF signal suppressed Identify demyelination

Image acquisition process and parameters

Drawing

What do we want?

What can we control?

Magnetic strengths 1.5T vs 3T vs 7T

MR sequences (i.e. timings of “excitation pulse”, “gradients”, and “echo acquisition” )

e.g. MPRAGE: Magnetization Prepared - RApid Gradient Echo (Commonly used in neuroimaging)

MP-RAGE MP2-RAGE
mprage Drawing

Spatial encoding of the signal

kspace

MPRAGE and k-space images Courtesy of Allen D. Elster, MRIquestions.com

Interacting with images (see this notebook for detailed example.)

import nibabel as nib
import nilearn
from nilearn import plotting
local_data_dir = '../local_data/1_sMRI_modalities/'
T1_filename = local_data_dir + 'craving_sub-SAXSISO01b_T1w.nii.gz'
T2_filename = local_data_dir +'craving_sub-SAXSISO01b_T2w.nii.gz'
T1_img = nib.load(T1_filename)
T2_img = nib.load(T2_filename)

# grab data array
T1_data = T1_img.get_fdata()
T2_data = T2_img.get_fdata()

# plot
plotting.plot_anat(T1_filename, title="T1", vmax=500)
plotting.plot_anat(T2_filename, title="T2", vmax=300)

T1w T2w
nilearn_T1 nilearn_T2

Key Points

  • Different acquisition techniques will offer better quantification of specific brain tissues


sMRI Clean-up

Overview

Teaching: 30 min
Exercises: 15 min
Questions
  • What are the sources of noise and artifacts in MR images?

  • How do we extract/mask the brain?

Objectives
  • Visualize bias fields and motion artifacts

  • Generate brain masks

You Are Here!

course_flow

Why do we need image clean-ups?

Correcting or cleaning-up certain artifacts from the raw (i.e. acquired) MR scans is crucial for the successful processing of subsequent image normalization tasks as well as the downstream statistical analyses. Some version (i.e. custom algorithm) of these two tasks is implemented in all commonly deployed processing pipelines such as FreeSurfer, FSL etc.

In this episode we will look at two common image clean-up tasks 1) Intensity normalization 2) Brain extraction.

Intensity normalization (a.k.a bias field correction; a.k.a. intensity inhomogeneity correction)

Bias field correction quiz

What is the difference between bias field and image noise?

Solution

Bias field is modeled as multiplicative factor, whereas noise is typically assumed as additive and spatially independent (Gaussian) factor.

i.e. v(x) = u(x)f(x) + n(x), where v is the given image, u is the uncorrupted image, f is the bias field, and n is the noise.

ANTs N4 correction

(a) Acquired T1w image (b) Estimated the bias field which can then be used to “correct” the image. (c) Bias field viewed as a surface to show the low frequency modulation. N4_bias

Side-note: ANTs is a software comprising several tools and image processing algorithms. ANTs can be run independently or we can import ANTs scripts in python using nipype library.

from nipype.interfaces.ants import N4BiasFieldCorrection

n4 = N4BiasFieldCorrection()
n4.inputs.dimension = 3
n4.inputs.input_image = 'structural.nii'
n4.inputs.bspline_fitting_distance = 300
n4.inputs.shrink_factor = 3
n4.inputs.n_iterations = [50,50,30,20]
n4.cmdline 

'N4BiasFieldCorrection --bspline-fitting [ 300 ] -d 3 --input-image structural.nii --convergence [ 50x50x30x20 ] --output structural_corrected.nii --shrink-factor 3'

Impact of correction (source: Despotović et al.)

The top figure panel shows original and bias field corrected MR image slices. The middle figure panel shows the difference in the intensty histograms for the two image slices. And the bottom figure panel shows the impact of bias correction on a subsequent image segmentation task.

bias_correction

Visualizing “before” and “after” (see ../code/2_sMRI_image_cleanup.ipynb for detailed example.)

import nibabel as nib
from nilearn import plotting

import nibabel as nib from nilearn import plotting

T1_orig = subject_dir + 'orig.mgz'
T1_corrected = subject_dir + 'nu.mgz'
T1_img_orig = nib.load(T1_orig)
T1_img_corrected = nib.load(T1_corrected)

# plot
cut_coords = (-85,-2,-5)
plotting.plot_anat(T1_orig, title="T1_orig", cut_coords=cut_coords, vmax=255)
plotting.plot_anat(T1_corrected, title="T1_corrected_img", cut_coords=cut_coords, vmax=255)
Before After
nilearn_bias_orig nilearn_bias_corr

Brain extraction (a.k.a skull-stripping)

Example brain extractions pass / fail

Pass Fail
Drawing Drawing

Source: FSL Introduction to Brain Extraction

Brain extraction quiz

Can we use this brain-mask as an estimate for brain volume?

Solution

Brain mask at this stage only offers a crude estimate about total brain volume. It can be used for quality control (e.g. detecting preprocessing algorithm failures). More accurate estimates of total brain and intracranial volumes are calculated in subsequent steps, which are used as covariates or normalizing factors in statistical analysis.

Side-note: ANTs is a software comprising several tools and image processing algorithms. ANTs can be run independently or we can import ANTs scripts in python using nipype library.

from nipype.interfaces.ants.segmentation import BrainExtraction
brainextraction = BrainExtraction()
brainextraction.inputs.dimension = 3
brainextraction.inputs.anatomical_image ='T1.nii.gz'
brainextraction.inputs.brain_template = 'study_template.nii.gz'
brainextraction.inputs.brain_probability_mask ='ProbabilityMaskOfStudyTemplate.nii.gz'
brainextraction.cmdline
'antsBrainExtraction.sh -a T1.nii.gz -m ProbabilityMaskOfStudyTemplate.nii.gz
-e study_template.nii.gz -d 3 -s nii.gz -o highres001_'

ANTs Brain Extraction

ANTs_brain_extract

FSL BET

FSL_brain_extract

Visualizing “before” and “after” (see ../code/2_sMRI_image_cleanup.ipynb for detailed example.)

from nipype.interfaces.ants.segmentation import BrainExtraction

import nibabel as nib from nilearn import plotting

T1_normalized = subject_dir + 'T1.mgz'
T1_brain_extract = subject_dir + 'brainmask.mgz'
T1_img_normalized = nib.load(T1_normalized)
T1_img_brain_extract = nib.load(T1_brain_extract)

# plot
cut_coords = (-85,-2,-5)
plotting.plot_anat(T1_img_normalized, title="T1_img_normalized", cut_coords=cut_coords, vmax=255)
plotting.plot_anat(T1_img_brain_extract, title="T1_img_brain_extract", cut_coords=cut_coords, vmax=255)

Before After
nilearn_brain_orig nilearn_brain_extract

Key Points

  • Presence of artifacts can lead to flawed analysis and incorrect findings


sMRI Spatial Normalization

Overview

Teaching: 30 min
Exercises: 15 min
Questions
  • What are reference coordinate systems

  • What are ‘templates’, ‘atlases’?

  • What is spatial normalization?

Objectives
  • Understand reference spaces and registration process

You Are Here!

course_flow

Why do we need spatial normalization

Compare and combine brain images across modalities, individuals, and studies

What do we need for spatial normalization

1. A reference frame: A 3D space that assigns x,y,z coordinates to anatomical regions (independent of voxel dimensions!).

2. A common template: a single or an average image volume as an alignment target

3. An image registration algorithm

1. Coordinate systems and spaces

slicer_coordinate_systems

Image source

World coordinates

The world coordinates refer to a Cartesian coordinate system in which a MRI (or other modality) scanner is positioned.

Anatomical coordinates

The anatomical space is coordinate system (X,Y,Z) that consists of three planes to describe the standard anatomical position of a human

The origin and directions of anatomical coordinate system are defined by conventions. In neuroimaging the most commonly used definition is the stereotaxic space.

Stereotaxic space

Drawing

Image coordinates

The image coordinate system (i,j,k) describes the acquired image (voxels) with respect to the anatomy. The MR images are 3D voxel arrays (i.e. grids) whose origin is assigned at the upper left corner. The i axis increases to the right, the j axis to the bottom and the k axis backwards.

The MR image metadata stores the anatomical location of the image origin and the spacing between two voxels (typically in mm).

For examples:

Drawing

Image source

Quiz: coordinate systems

What happens when you downsample a MR image?

Solution

Downsampling reduces the number of total voxels in the image. Consequently the voxel-spacing is increased as more anatomical space is “sampled” by any given voxel. Note that the new intensity values of the resampled voxels are determined based on the type of interpolation used.

2. MR image templates

T1 templates (MNI305, Collin27, MNI152 (linear), MNI152 (nonlinear))

MNI_spaces

Multimodal MNI/ICBM152 atlas

mni_icbm152

3. Image registration

A process that aligns an image from one coordinate space to another.

Note: Linear registrations are often used as an initialization step for non-linear registration.

registration_cartoon

Algorithm Deformation ~ parameters
FSL FLIRT Linear 9
ANIMAL Non-linear (Local translation) 69K
DARTEL Toolbox Non-linear (diffeomorphic) 6.4M
ANTs (SyN) Non-linear (bi-directional diffeomorphic) 28M

rigid_process

nonlinear_deform_process

Quiz: Image registration

What would the information encoded in the non-linear deformation tell you about the subject?

Solution

The deformation fields encode information regarding local morphometric brain changes. These can be quantified using “Jacobians” of the deformation field, and can be used to assess subtle morphometric differences between groups or timepoints.

Python snippet (see ../code/3_sMRI_spatial_norm.ipynb for detailed example.)

from nilearn import plotting
from nilearn import image
from nibabel.affines import apply_affine
cut_coords = (-40,10,0)

A = np.array([[1.053177, -0.061204, -0.060685, 90.310684],
             [0.070210, 1.009246, 0.117766, -9.806847],
             [0.023069, -0.117785, 1.186777, 13.209366],
             [0. ,0. , 0., 1.]])

cut_coords_affine_transformed = apply_affine(A, cut_coords)
x,y,z = cut_coords_affine_transformed
cut_coords_affine_transformed_str = "({},{},{})".format(int(x),int(y),int(z))

print("Subject space to refernce space mapping:\n {} --> {}".format(cut_coords,cut_coords_affine_transformed_str))

Subject space to refernce space mapping:
 (-40, 10, 0) --> (47,-2,11)

nilearn_reg

Subject space vs reference space: use cases

subject_vs_ref_space

Key Points

  • Reference coordinate spaces and spatial normalization offer a way to map and compare brain anatomy across modalities, individuals, and studies


sMRI Segmentation and Parcellation

Overview

Teaching: 25 min
Exercises: 10 min
Questions
  • How do we segment the brain into tissue classes ?

  • How do we further divide a tissue class into sub-components ?

  • How are volumetric and surface data defined ?

Objectives
  • Understand and visualize tissue segmentation

  • Manipulate atlases to extract regions of interests

  • Visualize and interact with both volumetric and surface data

You Are Here!

course_flow

Segmentation of brain tissues

Brain anatomy is different for every individual. Brain tissues are typically divided into:

Each class can inform on different aspects of the brain. Therefore it is often useful to segment the brain in these tissue components for further processing.

Brain tissue types

An important aspect to keep in mind is that aging and disease can cause tissue modifications. Common changes include a reduction in GM, as in the case of ageing and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s. A tumor can cause an important localized change of signal in the area most impacted by the tumor. Another example is visibly higher WM signal intensities on T2 MRI images, so called WM hyper-intensities, which can be related to vascular pathology (common in aging), or to myelin lesions characteristic of the multiple sclerosis disease.

Brain atrophy due to Alzheimer's or severe multiple sclerosis disease This image is Copyright © My-MS.org and falls under Image License D defined under the Image License section of the My-MS.org Disclaimer page.

The analysis of preprocessed structural images then often consists in:

  1. Identifying tissue classes – including pathological tissue when appropriate – and their sub-components: this is done by segmenting the MRI images, and the topic of the current episode
  2. Quantifying morphological differences: this is typically done by measuring morphological properties such as GM volume or thickness in the whole brain or within specific regions, and this is the topic of episode 6

Can we measure brain changes in healthy young adults as well ? This is what we will ultimately try to find out at the end of our lesson !

In this episode we will more precisely look at:

Which software to use for segmentation and parcellation ?

Common software to segment volumetric data include FSL, SPM and ANTS. One of the most used software to segment surface data (in addition of volumetric data) is Freesurfer. In this episode, we will use the outputs generated by smriprep/fmriprep, which are workflows relying on all these software to generate a large variety of segmentation outputs.

Tissue segmentation and visualization in practice

The tissues can be differentiated according to the MRI signal intensity, however as seen in episode 2, the main magnetic field can introduce bias and create signal inhomogeneities. It is therefore important to implement bias field correction before carrying out segmentation according to tissue intensities.

Usually the T1 MRI modality is used for segmentation as it offers the best contrast between GM, WM and CSF. However combining multiple modalities (such as T2, PD and FLAIR) can help improving the segmentation, especially in the presence of lesions.

Tissue segmentation is presented first for normal controls. Then examples of changes that can happen in disease are shown for patients having Alzheimer’s or the multiple sclerosis disease.

In normal controls

In normal controls, the number of tissue classes is usually fixed (there are not additional classes of pathological tissue). In practice, a distribution of the intensity of the different tissue types can be obtained by loading T1 volumes with nibabel then plotting a slice with matplotlib and displaying an histogram with seaborn (a plotting library built on top of matplotlib). Assuming we already loaded a T1 brain volume t1_brain_data, visualizing the T1 data and the associated intensity histogram is obtained with:

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
# Plot first figure
plt.imshow(t1_data[:, :, 110], vmax=300000, origin="lower")
plt.title('T1 data before skull-stripping')
# Plot second figure
plt.imshow(t1_brain_data[:, :, 110], vmax=300000, origin="lower")
plt.title('T1 data after skull-stripping')

Axial slice of the T1 data (after skull-stripping)

# Compute the optimal bin size according to the data
bins = np.histogram_bin_edges(t1_brain_data[t1_brain_data != 0], bins='auto')
# Plot the histogram
sns.histplot(t1_brain_data[t1_brain_data != 0], bins=bins)
plt.xlim([0, 300000])

Histogram of the T1 volume data, all tissues together

We can see here three main components corresponding to GM, WM and CSF.

Jupyter notebook challenge

Can you modify the code in the Jupyter notebook to plot the histogram of the brain before skull-stripping ?

Hint

Try to switch the variable of one T1 image for another.

We can visualize the segmentation by loading adding an overlay representing the different tissue classes after segmentation. For this, we use the nilearn library to plot the t1_seg segmentation data from smriprep/fmriprep.

from nilearn import plotting
plotting.plot_roi(roi_img=t1_seg, bg_img=t1, alpha=0.3, cmap="Set1");

Tissue classes overlayed on the T1 data

Now that we have access to each tissue class, we can check the contribution of each in the intensity histogram.

import itertools
labels = np.unique(t1_seg_data[t1_seg_data != 0]).astype('int')
palette = itertools.cycle(sns.color_palette("Set3"))
for label in labels:
    sns.histplot(t1_brain_data[t1_seg_data == label], bins=bins, color=next(palette), alpha=0.6)

Histogram of the T1 volume data, one distribution per tissue

A simple matter of thresholding ?

From the previous histogram, does the intensity itself seem enough to differentiate between different tissue classes ?

Solution

From the shape of the histogram we can see there is some overlap between the tissue distributions. Segmentation on intensity alone is most often not enough, and additional information is required, such as the use of a template with a-priori tissue probability maps (probability of presence of a given tissue at a given location).

A question of probability

In the previous segmentation volume, each voxel has a single integer value (1, 2 or 3) according to which tissue class it belongs. In practice however the primary output of segmentation tools are probability maps: one probability map per tissue class. In this probability map, each voxel has a value between 0 and 1 to indicate the probability to belong to that tissue class.

Below is an example of visualization of a GM probability map GM_probmap.

plotting.plot_roi(roi_img=GM_probmap, bg_img=t1, alpha=0.3, cmap="jet", vmin=0.5, vmax=1);

GM probability map

The segmentation into GM and WM voxels allows to identify surfaces surrounding these tissues. The images below show:

Delineation of GM and WM

We can now have a closer look at surface data !

Surface data

Some software such as Freesurfer specialize in surface data. Contrarily to volumetric data which are collections of voxels, surface data are collections of vertices and faces of a mesh.

Delineation of GM and WM

The most commonly use surfaces are the pial GM and the underlying WM. Let’s visualize the pial GM using nilearn on the Freesurfer pial_surf_file output by smriprep/fmriprep and loaded in the notebook.

# The pial surface is the most external surface of the GM
pial_surf = nib.load(pial_surf_file)
pial_verts, pial_faces = pial_surf.agg_data(('pointset', 'triangle'))
plotting.plot_surf((pial_verts, pial_faces))

Pial mesh from surface segmentation

Jupyter notebook challenge

Can you modify the code in the Jupyter notebook to plot the white matter surface ?

Hint

Try to explore the BIDSLayout output to find the right surface file.

In disease such as Alzheimer’s and multiple sclerosis

The brain GM volume tends to shrink with age, with the GM loss typically replaced with CSF. This process is called atrophy. In Alzheimer’s disease and other neuro-degenerative disease, atrophy is amplified (the “degeneration” is the loss of GM). Therefore special care is required when processing data of patients whose disease can cause changes in the brain morphology.

Below is a T1 image of an Alzheimer’s disease patient. An enlargement of the CSF-containing cavities, the ventricles, can be seen.

WM mesh from surface segmentation

Below is a T1 and FLAIR image of an MS patient. The lesion-enhancing FLAIR modality clearly show lesions. These lesions can sometimes be seen on the T1 image. In this case they appear as dark spots called “black holes”.

WM mesh from surface segmentation

Segmentation problems in disease

What problems do you expect in the tissue segmentation of multiple sclerosis images ?

Solution

An algorithm expecting three tissues types may misclassify lesions as GM on T1 images. Filling lesions with intensity corresponding to WM is a solution sometimes used to avoid these issues (e.g. with Freesurfer). Some software such as ANTs directly accepts a binary lesion mask as an input to deal with this kind of data.

Segmenting tissue classes into sub-components: atlasing, parcellation

A natural step after identifying tissue classes, is sub-dividing the tissue(s) of interest into sub-components. GM is commonly split into non-overlapping regions of interests (ROIs). This splitting process is called “parcellation” and allows to be more specific about the brain areas studied. Parcellation can be purely data-driven, anatomically-driven, or both.

In this lesson we focus on GM. WM parcellation is also common but it requires dedicated MRI sequences and analysis techniques, e.g. by identifying group of WM tracts called bundles with tractography (please refer to the lesson on diffusion MRI if you would like to know more about WM parcellation).

The usefulness of an atlas comes from the fact that each subject brain can be registered to the template on which that atlas is defined. A correct registration to the template is therefore essential for a correct labelling of the brain voxels / vertices. The template the images are registered to should also be the template on which the atlas has been defined (or highly similar).

Atlas vs Parcellation

A parcellation can be defined as the splitting of an object into non-overlapping components. Since an atlas divide the brain into regions, atlasing can be considered a kind of parcellation. Reciprocally, any kind of brain parcellation can be considered an “atlas”.

A difference is that an atlas is often expected to be defined on an entire brain, while a parcellation can be limited to a specific region (e.g. thalamus parcellation). A parcellation can also be applied for example to the cortical GM (the outer layer of the brain) or the subcortical GM for deep GM (GM structures below the cortex).

Note that Freesurfer call cortical parcellation “parcellation” (denoting parc the associated files) and subcortical parcellation “segmentation” (denoting seg the associated files).

The picture can be muddled when considering probabilistic atlases. In this case each atlas region is associated to a probabilistic map. Just like tissue probability maps, each voxel (or vertex) has a given probability to belong to the region considered.

Probability atlas threshold

Given a probabilistic atlas, is there a single probability threshold which would guaranteed each brain volume voxel (or surface vertices) to have a unique label ? If yes, which threshold would you choose, and if not how would you proceed ?

Solution

In virtually all cases no single probability threshold will result in each voxel (or vertex) belonging to a unique ROI. A high threshold will result in voxels not having a label, while a low threshold will cause voxels to belong to overlapping probability maps. A “true” parcellation could be obtained by associating to each voxel (or vertex) the label with the maximum probability.

Visualizing and extracting ROIs of a non probabilistic volumetric atlas

An example of a volumetric atlas motivated by neuroanatomy is the Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas. Each ROI has an anatomically meaningful text label. The atlas is aligned with the MNI MRI single-subject brain. The atlas is represented as a 3D volume in which each voxel has an integer index which corresponds to an ROI label, e.g. 2401 for the left hemisphere supplementary motor area.

Nilearn offers a collection of atlases in its datasets module. The AAL atlas, text labels and integer indices can all be obtained through this module.

from nilearn.datasets import fetch_atlas_aal
AAL_dataset = fetch_atlas_aal()
AAL_maps = AAL_dataset.maps
AAL_labels = AAL_dataset['labels']
AAL_labels_ix = AAL_dataset['indices']

We can check the atlas dimension by loading it with nibabel

AAL_img = nib.load(AAL_maps)
AAL_img.shape
(91, 109, 91)

Plotting the atlas

To plot the atlas we can use as background either the template on which it was defined (or one highly similar), or a subject volume aligned with that template. In our case we use the t1_mni volume of our subject and use the plot_roi function of the nilearn plotting module to add the atlas as an overlay:

plotting.plot_roi(roi_img=AAL_maps, bg_img=t1_mni, alpha=0.4, title="AAL atlas");

AAL atlas

We can extract a specific ROI in two steps:

  1. Identify the integer index corresponding to the ROI
  2. Get all the voxels corresponding to that index

Identifying an ROI integer index

Sometimes the integer index directly correspond to the label list index, e.g. if “visual cortex” is in position 3 in AAL_dataset[‘labels’] then the corresponding integer index in the image is 3. For the AAL atlas, the ROI indices are not in the order of the text labels so nilearn provide a list of ROI indices. Since the list of labels match the list of indices we proceed in two steps:

  1. Find the position of the ROI in the list of AAL_labels
  2. Use the same position in the list of indices
roi_label = "Supp_Motor_Area_L"
roi_label_pos = AAL_labels.index(roi_label)
roi_ix = int(AAL_labels_ix[roi_label_pos])
print(roi_ix)
2401

Getting all voxels corresponding to that index

To create a binary ROI image from the ROI index, we:

  1. Create a boolean array with True if the voxel label is equal to our ROI index, and False if not
  2. Convert the boolean array to integer
roi_mask_arr_bool = (AAL_img.get_fdata() == roi_ix)
roi_mask_arr = roi_mask_arr_bool.astype(int)

To create a nibabel image object, we then need to attach the original image affine transform

roi_mask = nib.Nifti1Image(roi_mask_arr, affine=AAL_img.affine)

we can now plot the ROI using the plot_roi function of nilearn

plotting.plot_roi(roi_img=roi_mask, bg_img=t1_mni, alpha=0.4, title=roi_label);

ROI from the AAL atlas

Visualizing and extracting ROIs of a surface atlas

For the previous atlas, the unit elements to receive a label were voxels. When considering the surface of the cortex, unit elements are the vertices of the surface mesh. Each such vertex can receive a label, and the result is a surface parcellation.

Freesurfer relies on two surface atlases: the Desikan-Killiany Atlas with 68 ROIs and the Destrieux Atlas with 148 ROIs. The Destrieux atlas is part of the nilearn datasets and we will focus on this atlas in the lesson.

Surface datasets are split in left and right hemisphere. Let’s aim at plotting the left hemisphere. As we will see also how to plot a specific ROI, we will also extract the atlas labels.

from nilearn.datasets import fetch_atlas_surf_destrieux
parcellation_L = destrieux['map_left']
destrieux_labels = destrieux['labels']

Plotting the atlas

For plotting a 3D volume we needed a 3D image template. For a surface, we need a 3D surface (also called mesh) template. The Destrieux atlas we collected is defined on the fsaverage5 Freesurfer template, so we will need it to plot our atlas.

fsaverage = fetch_surf_fsaverage()
mesh = fsaverage['pial_left']
plotting.plot_surf_roi(mesh, roi_map=parcellation_L,
                       hemi='left', view='lateral');

Left hemisphere of the Destrieux surface atlas

Extracting a specific ROI

To extract a specific ROI, we can proceed as we did for the AAL atlas but using the Destrieux labels.

pcc_region = b'G_cingul-Post-dorsal'
roi_ix = destrieux_labels.index(pcc_region)
roi_mask_arr = (parcellation_L == roi_ix).astype(int)

To plot that ROI, we can use the plot_surf_roi function of the nilearn plotting module. We will plot the medial view since this ROI is located towards the central part of the brain. We will also use the template as background image since most vertices do not have a label to be plotted.

plotting.plot_surf_roi(mesh, roi_map=roi_mask_arr, hemi='left', view='medial',
                       bg_map=fsaverage['sulc_left']);

ROI of the Destrieux surface atlas

Jupyter notebook challenge

Can you modify the code in the Jupyter notebook to extract and display the right precuneus ?

Hint

This exercise involves a change of both ROI and hemisphere.

Because atlases can be overlaid on a subject brain registered to the atlas template, one can extract measurements specific to that subject within each atlas ROI. We will see common metrics and how to extract them in episode 6, and the important role of the WM and GM pial surfaces for this purpose.

Key Points

  • Brain segmentation and parcellation is a key step towards further analysis

  • The brain can be represented via different data format (volume, surface)

  • Multiple python libraries are particularly useful to manipulate brain data


sMRI Quality Control

Overview

Teaching: 20 min
Exercises: 10 min
Questions
  • How do we identify image preprocessing failures?

Objectives
  • Visualize processing failures

  • Familiarize with automatic QC tools

You Are Here!

course_flow

Things that can go wrong…

Acquistion

Due to MR physics (e.g. Field of view (FOV), ghosting, aliasing)

Incorrect parameters can truncate and/or duplicate brain anatomy.

Drawing

Due to participant (e.g. Motion artifacts)

Drawing

Quantification

Exisiting image processing pipelines (e.g. FreeSurfer, CIVET) will have a few QC tools and examples that can help with failure detection and quality control of volumetric segmentations and surface parcellations.

Drawing

Usage of new method will require your own QC protocols. Especially for highly specific segmentation methods require visual inspection from a neuroanatomy expert. Even for the qualitiative visual inspection, it is important create a QC protocol and share it with the results.

HC_and_CB_MAGeT

Note: see Hippocampal and cerebellar for segmentation method details.

Automatic QC tools

Using reports from exisiting pipelines: https://fmriprep.org/en/stable/_static/sample_report.html

Drawing

Using QC tools

MRIQC: extracts no-reference IQMs (image quality metrics) from structural (T1w and T2w) and functional MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) data. (Developed by the Poldrack Lab at Stanford University for use at the Center for Reproducible Neuroscience (CRN), as well as for open-source software distribution.)

Individual report Group report
Drawing Drawing

VisualQC: assistive tool to improve the quality control workflow of neuroimaging data (Author: Pradeep Reddy Raamana).

T1w acquisition Alignment Cortical Parcellation
t1_mri_visual_QC alignment_mismatched_colormix_visualQC cortical_zoomed_in

Key Points

  • Image processing failures happen! It is important to perform systematic quality control to minimize biases


sMRI Statistical Analysis

Overview

Teaching: 25 min
Exercises: 10 min
Questions
  • How to quantify brain morphology ?

  • How to assess statistically differences of brain morphology ?

  • Can we detect brain changes related to age in a cohort of young adults ?

Objectives
  • Understand the main metrics characterizing the brain morphology

  • Extract and rely on a set of metrics to assess the effect of age on multiple cortical regions

  • Understand and implement voxel based morphometry to investigate the effect of age without predefined regions

You Are Here!

course_flow

All the previous episodes presented the required steps to arrive at a stage where the data is ready for metrics extraction and statistical analysis. In this episode we will introduce common metrics used to characterize the brain structure and morphology, and we will investigate statistical approaches to assess if age related brain changes can be found in a cohort of young adults.

Quantifying tissue properties

As seen in previous episodes, brain structural data can be represented as volumes or surfaces. Each of these representations are associated to different characteristics. In this episode we will look at:

Metric from volumetric data: region volumes

A simple metric to quantify brain imaging data is volume. The image is represented as voxels, however the voxel dimensions can vary from one MRI sequence to another. Some FLAIR sequences have 1.5 mm isotropic voxels (i.e. 1.5 mm wide in all directions), while T1 sequences have 1 mm isotropic voxels. Other sequences do not have isotropic voxels (the voxel dimensions vary depending on direction). As a result the number of voxels is not useful to compare subjects and a standard unit such that mm3 or cm3 should be used instead.

We will consider here a volumetric atlas created by smriprep/fmriprep via Freesurfer. A particularity is that this atlas is mapped to the subject native space so that we can measure the volume of each atlas ROI in the space of the subject. Our aim is to measure the volume of the right caudate nucleus, in standard unit (mm3). We will first see how to obtain the volume manually, and then how to simply retrieve it from a file referencing several region volumes.

Measuring an ROI volume manually

Consider a subject’s native T1 volume t1 and a parcellation of the subcortical GM provided by Freesurfer in that space, t1_aseg. We already know from episode 4 how to extract an ROI. According to the Freesurfer Look-up Table the right caudate has index 50.

roi_ix = 50
roi_mask_arr_bool = (t1_aseg_data == roi_ix)
roi_mask_arr = roi_mask_arr_bool.astype(int)
roi_mask = nib.Nifti1Image(roi_mask_arr, affine=t1_aseg.affine)

We can verify our ROI extraction by plotting it over the subject’s T1 data with nilearn plotting function:

plotting.plot_roi(roi_img=roi_mask, bg_img=t1, alpha=0.4, title='Right Caudate');

Caudate nucleus from Freesurfer segmentation

We can get the number of voxels by counting them in the mask.

caudate_R_n_vox = roi_mask_arr.sum()
caudate_R_n_vox
3854

An image voxel size can be obtained from the file metadata (i.e. data annotation) stored in the image header. nibabel provide an header attribute with a method get_zooms() to obtain the voxel size.

voxel_dimensions = t1.header.get_zooms()
voxel_dimensions
(1.0, 1.0, 1.0)

In our case the volume of the voxel, the product of its dimensions, is simply 1mm3:

vox_size = np.array(voxel_dimensions).prod()
vox_size
1.0

The volume in mm3 of the right caudate of our subject is then:

caudate_R_vol_mm3 = caudate_R_n_vox * vox_size
caudate_R_vol_mm3
3854.0

Note that nibabel offers a utility function to compute the volume of a mask in mm3 according to the voxel size:

import nibabel.imagestats as imagestats
imagestats.mask_volume(roi_mask)
3854.0

Extracting ROI volume from software generated reports

It turns out that characteristics of a number of ROIs are output by Freesurfer and saved in a text file. For example the volume of subcortical ROIs can be found in the file stats/aseg.stats. We use the function islice of the Python itertools module to extract the first lines of the file:

n_lines = 110
with open(os.path.join(fs_rawstats_dir, "aseg.stats")) as fs_stats_file:
    first_n_lines = list(islice(fs_stats_file, n_lines))
['# Title Segmentation Statistics \n',
 '# \n',
 '# generating_program mri_segstats\n',
 '# cvs_version $Id: mri_segstats.c,v 1.121 2016/05/31 17:27:11 greve Exp $\n',
 '# cmdline mri_segstats --seg mri/aseg.mgz --sum stats/aseg.stats --pv mri/norm.mgz --empty --brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --brain-vol-from-seg --excludeid 0 --excl-ctxgmwm --supratent --subcortgray --in mri/norm.mgz --in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units MR --etiv --surf-wm-vol --surf-ctx-vol --totalgray --euler --ctab /opt/freesurfer/ASegStatsLUT.txt --subject sub-0001 \n',
...
 '# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName normMean normStdDev normMin normMax normRange  \n',
 '  1   4      3820     4245.9  Left-Lateral-Ventricle            30.4424    13.2599     7.0000    83.0000    76.0000 \n',
...
 ' 23  49      7142     6806.7  Right-Thalamus-Proper             83.4105    10.4588    32.0000   104.0000    72.0000 \n',
 ' 24  50      3858     3804.7  Right-Caudate                     73.2118     7.9099    37.0000    96.0000    59.0000 \n',
 ' 25  51      5649     5586.9  Right-Putamen                     79.4707     7.1056    46.0000   103.0000    57.0000 \n',
...

Surprisingly the volume in mm3 is not the same as we found: 3804.7. This is because instead of counting each voxel in the GM mask as 100%, the fraction of estimated GM was taken into account. The estimation of the so called “partial volume” can be done in several manners. One which will be useful for us later is to use the GM probability map GM_probmap as a surrogate of a GM partial volume map. Let’s see the ROI volume we obtain in this way:

GM_roi_data = np.where(roi_mask_arr_bool, GM_probmap.get_fdata(), 0)
GM_roi_data.sum() * vox_size
3354.5343634674136

Like with Freesurfer we observe a reduction of GM, albeit significantly more pronounced.

Jupyter notebook challenge

Taking into account partial volume, can you measure the volume of the Left Caudate ? And if you feel adventurous of the Left Lateral ventricle ?

Hint

Use the Freesurfer LUT to identify the correct ROI index. For the lateral ventricle, make sure you use the appropriate tissue type to correct for partial volume effect.

Metric from surface data: cortical thickness

As seen in the previous section, volumetric ROI metrics can be made available by dedicated software. This is also the case for surface metrics which are often more involved than computing the number of voxels. One of the most used surface metric is cortical thickness: the distance separating the GM pial surface from the WM surface directly underneath. We will use the output from Freesurfer to:

Extracting cortical thickness information

Freesurfer output a number of files including both volume and surface metrics. These files are generated by Freesurfer for each subject and can be found in derivatives/freesurfer/stats when using smriprep/fmriprep.

os.listdir(fs_rawstats_dir)
['lh.BA_exvivo.thresh.stats',
 'rh.aparc.a2009s.stats',
 'rh.aparc.pial.stats',
 'rh.aparc.DKTatlas.stats',
 'lh.curv.stats',
 'lh.w-g.pct.stats',
 'wmparc.stats',
 'lh.aparc.stats',
 'rh.BA_exvivo.thresh.stats',
 'rh.BA_exvivo.stats',
 'rh.w-g.pct.stats',
 'lh.aparc.pial.stats',
 'lh.BA_exvivo.stats',
 'rh.curv.stats',
 'aseg.stats',
 'lh.aparc.DKTatlas.stats',
 'lh.aparc.a2009s.stats',
 'rh.aparc.stats']

aseg files are related to subcortical regions, as we just saw with aseg.stats, while aparc files include cortical metrics and are often separated into left (lh) and right hemisphere (rh). aparc.stats is for the Desikan-Killiany atlas while aparc.a2009s.stats is for the Destrieux atlas (148 ROIs vs 68 ROIs for Desikan-Killiany).

Looking at the Destrieux ROI measurements in the left hemisphere from lh.aparc.a2009s.stats we get:

n_lines = 75
with open(os.path.join(fs_rawstats_dir, "lh.aparc.a2009s.stats")) as fs_stats_file:
    first_n_lines = list(islice(fs_stats_file, n_lines))
['# Table of FreeSurfer cortical parcellation anatomical statistics \n',
 '# \n',
 '# CreationTime 2019/03/02-22:05:09-GMT\n',
 '# generating_program mris_anatomical_stats\n',
 '# cvs_version $Id: mris_anatomical_stats.c,v 1.79 2016/03/14 15:15:34 greve Exp $\n',
 '# mrisurf.c-cvs_version $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.781.2.6 2016/12/27 16:47:14 zkaufman Exp $\n',
 '# cmdline mris_anatomical_stats -th3 -mgz -cortex ../label/lh.cortex.label -f ../stats/lh.aparc.a2009s.stats -b -a ../label/lh.aparc.a2009s.annot -c ../label/aparc.annot.a2009s.ctab sub-0001 lh white \n',
 ...
 '# ColHeaders StructName NumVert SurfArea GrayVol ThickAvg ThickStd MeanCurv GausCurv FoldInd CurvInd\n',
 'G&S_frontomargin                         1116    840   1758  1.925 0.540     0.128     0.025       14     1.0\n',
 'G&S_occipital_inf                        1980   1336   3775  2.517 0.517     0.144     0.028       27     2.1\n',
 'G&S_paracentral                          1784   1108   2952  2.266 0.581     0.105     0.018       17     1.3\n',
 ...

You can see a number of metrics, with more information in the skipped header on their units. The one of particular interest to us is the cortical thickness ThickAvg. Since the thickness is measured at each vertex of the mesh, both the man and standard deviation can be estimated for each ROI. The values at each vertex is available in the freesurfer native file lh.thickness. Let’s use it to plot the values on a mesh.

Plotting cortical thickness values on a subject mesh

To plot the cortical thickness values on a subject cortical mesh we will use the native Freesurfer file formats (although the GII file output by smriprep/fmriprep could also be used as seen in episode 4). Considering we identified for the left hemispher the path to the pial mesh lh_pial and the mesh thickness values lh_thickness (as well as the sulcus mesh lh_sulcus for a better plot rendering), we can obtain mesh lateral and medial views with the following Python code:

# Lateral
plotting.plot_surf(lh_pial, surf_map=lh_thickness, hemi='left', view='lateral', bg_map=lh_sulcus);
# Medial
plotting.plot_surf(lh_pial, surf_map=lh_thickness, hemi='left', view='medial', bg_map=lh_sulcus);

Cortical thickness visualization for a given subject

Generating and plotting summary group measurements

Files including metrics for each subject can be leveraged to generate group results automatically. The first step is to generate more easily manipulatable CSV/TSV files from the Freesurfer native text files. This can be done with the Freesurfer asegstats2table command such as with the code below adapted from this script:

SUBJECTS=(...)
MEASURE=thickness
PARC=aparc.a2009s
for HEMI in lh rh; do
    echo "Running aparcstats2table with measure ${MEASURE} and parcellation ${parc} for hemisphere ${HEMI}"
    aparcstats2table --subjects ${SUBJECTS[@]} \
        --hemi ${hemi} \
        --parc ${parc} \
        --measure ${MEASURE} \
        --tablefile ../derivatives/fs_stats/data-cortical_type-${parc}_measure-${MEASURE}_hemi-${HEMI}.tsv \
        --delimiter 'tab'           
done

Then the resulting files can be read with pandas to create a dataframe including cortical thickness information for all our subjects.

hemi="lh"
stats_file = os.path.join(fs_stats_dir, 
                          f"data-cortical_type-aparc.a2009s_measure-thickness_hemi-{hemi}.tsv")
fs_hemi_df = pd.read_csv(stats_file,sep='\t')
fs_hemi_df

As shown in the notebook associated with the lesson we can then create a dataframe fs_df combining both data from both hemispheres, while also renaming columns to facilitate subsequent analysis.

fs_df
participant_id	G_and_S_frontomargin	G_and_S_occipital_inf	G_and_S_paracentral	G_and_S_subcentral	G_and_S_transv_frontopol	G_and_S_cingul_Ant	G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Ant	G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Post	G_cingul_Post_dorsal	...	S_precentral_sup_part	S_suborbital	S_subparietal	S_temporal_inf	S_temporal_sup	S_temporal_transverse	MeanThickness	BrainSegVolNotVent	eTIV	hemi
0	sub-0001	1.925	2.517	2.266	2.636	2.600	2.777	2.606	2.736	2.956	...	2.302	2.417	2.514	2.485	2.462	2.752	2.56319	1235952.0	1.560839e+06	lh
1	sub-0002	2.405	2.340	2.400	2.849	2.724	2.888	2.658	2.493	3.202	...	2.342	3.264	2.619	2.212	2.386	2.772	2.45903	1056970.0	1.115228e+06	lh
2	sub-0003	2.477	2.041	2.255	2.648	2.616	2.855	2.924	2.632	2.984	...	2.276	2.130	2.463	2.519	2.456	2.685	2.53883	945765.0	1.186697e+06	lh
3	sub-0004	2.179	2.137	2.366	2.885	2.736	2.968	2.576	2.593	3.211	...	2.145	2.920	2.790	2.304	2.564	2.771	2.51093	973916.0	9.527770e+05	lh
4	sub-0005	2.483	2.438	2.219	2.832	2.686	3.397	2.985	2.585	3.028	...	2.352	3.598	2.331	2.494	2.665	2.538	2.53830	1089881.0	1.497743e+06	lh
5 rows × 79 columns

We can then create a boxplot of the mean cortical thickness distribution in each ROI with seaborn, after first converting the dataframe from wide to long format:

plot_df = fs_df[["hemi"] + roi_cols]
## Melt dataframe for easier visualization
plot_long_df = pd.melt(plot_df, id_vars = ['hemi'], value_vars = roi_cols, 
                       var_name ='ROI', value_name ='cortical thickness')
plot_long_df
	hemi	ROI	cortical thickness
0	lh	G_and_S_frontomargin	1.925
1	lh	G_and_S_frontomargin	2.405
2	lh	G_and_S_frontomargin	2.477
3	lh	G_and_S_frontomargin	2.179
4	lh	G_and_S_frontomargin	2.483
...	...	...	...
33443	rh	S_temporal_transverse	3.006
33444	rh	S_temporal_transverse	2.683
33445	rh	S_temporal_transverse	2.418
33446	rh	S_temporal_transverse	2.105
33447	rh	S_temporal_transverse	2.524

g = sns.catplot(x='cortical thickness', y='ROI', hue='hemi', kind='box', data=plot_long_df)

Group cortical thickness boxplot

Statistical analysis: cortical thickness analysis based on a surface atlas

Can we measure cortical thickness changes with age in young adults ?

Now that we have cortical thickness measures, we can try to answer this question by:

Gathering the model predictors

Since we are interested in the effect of age, we will collect the subject demographics information which is readily available from the BIDS dataset. In addition of the age information, we will use sex as a covariate.

subjects_info_withna = bids_layout.get(suffix="participants", extension=".tsv")[0].get_df()
subjects_info_withna
participant_id	age	sex	BMI	handedness	education_category	raven_score	NEO_N	NEO_E	NEO_O	NEO_A	NEO_C
0	sub-0001	25.50	M	21.0	right	academic	33.0	23	40	52	47	32
1	sub-0002	23.25	F	22.0	right	academic	19.0	22	47	34	53	46
2	sub-0003	25.00	F	23.0	right	applied	29.0	26	42	37	48	48
3	sub-0004	20.00	F	18.0	right	academic	24.0	32	42	36	48	52
4	sub-0005	24.75	M	27.0	right	academic	24.0	32	51	41	51	53
...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...
221	sub-0222	22.00	F	20.0	right	academic	30.0	41	35	51	48	42
222	sub-0223	20.75	F	23.0	left	applied	26.0	33	41	54	36	41
223	sub-0224	21.75	M	20.0	right	academic	34.0	22	45	47	46	46
224	sub-0225	20.25	F	28.0	right	academic	27.0	48	32	43	42	37
225	sub-0226	20.00	M	20.0	right	applied	19.0	28	40	39	42	29

Jupyter notebook challenge

As the name of our dataframe implies, there may be an issue with the data. Can you spot it ?

Hint

You’ll need to use your pandas-fu for this exercise. Check for NA (aka missing) values in your pandas dataframe. You can use the isnull(), any() and .loc methods for filtering rows.

Jupyter notebook challenge

If you spotted the issue in the previous challenge, what would you propose to solve it ?

Hint

Data imputation can be applied to appropriate columns, with the fillna() method. You may be interested in the .mean() and/our mode() methods to get the mean and most frequent values.

Now that we have our predictors, to make subsequent analyses easier we can merge them with our response/predicted cortical thickness variable in a single dataframe.

demo_cols = ["participant_id", "age", "sex"]
fs_all_df = pd.merge(subjects_info[demo_cols], fs_df, on='participant_id')
fs_all_df
	participant_id	age	sex	G_and_S_frontomargin	G_and_S_occipital_inf	G_and_S_paracentral	G_and_S_subcentral	G_and_S_transv_frontopol	G_and_S_cingul_Ant	G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Ant	...	S_precentral_sup_part	S_suborbital	S_subparietal	S_temporal_inf	S_temporal_sup	S_temporal_transverse	MeanThickness	BrainSegVolNotVent	eTIV	hemi
0	sub-0001	25.50	M	1.925	2.517	2.266	2.636	2.600	2.777	2.606	...	2.302	2.417	2.514	2.485	2.462	2.752	2.56319	1235952.0	1.560839e+06	lh
1	sub-0001	25.50	M	2.216	2.408	2.381	2.698	2.530	2.947	2.896	...	2.324	2.273	2.588	2.548	2.465	2.675	2.51412	1235952.0	1.560839e+06	rh
2	sub-0002	23.25	F	2.405	2.340	2.400	2.849	2.724	2.888	2.658	...	2.342	3.264	2.619	2.212	2.386	2.772	2.45903	1056970.0	1.115228e+06	lh
3	sub-0002	23.25	F	2.682	2.454	2.511	2.725	2.874	3.202	3.012	...	2.429	2.664	2.676	2.220	2.291	2.714	2.48075	1056970.0	1.115228e+06	rh
4	sub-0003	25.00	F	2.477	2.041	2.255	2.648	2.616	2.855	2.924	...	2.276	2.130	2.463	2.519	2.456	2.685	2.53883	945765.0	1.186697e+06	lh
...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...
447	sub-0224	21.75	M	2.076	2.653	2.098	2.307	2.463	2.735	2.602	...	2.136	3.253	2.495	2.309	2.562	2.418	2.41761	1140289.0	1.302062e+06	rh
448	sub-0225	20.25	F	2.513	2.495	2.141	2.492	2.757	2.553	2.238	...	2.304	2.870	2.275	2.481	2.533	2.009	2.43156	1080245.0	1.395822e+06	lh
449	sub-0225	20.25	F	3.061	2.164	2.097	2.462	2.753	3.134	2.786	...	2.174	3.429	2.385	2.378	2.303	2.105	2.41200	1080245.0	1.395822e+06	rh
450	sub-0226	20.00	M	3.010	2.189	2.562	3.142	4.072	3.051	2.292	...	2.375	2.812	2.756	2.524	2.617	2.495	2.62877	1257771.0	1.583713e+06	lh
451	sub-0226	20.00	M	3.851	2.270	2.274	2.610	4.198	3.421	3.007	...	2.371	4.938	2.894	2.663	2.445	2.524	2.63557	1257771.0	1.583713e+06	rh
452 rows × 81 columns

We can plot the cortical thickness data as a function of age for a single ROI to have an idea of what we may find when applying our model on all ROIs. Let’s look for example at the anterior mid-cingulate cortex (G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Ant).

response = 'G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Ant'
predictor = 'age'
g = sns.scatterplot(x=predictor, y=response, hue='hemi', data=plot_df)

Example of cortical thickness variation with age in an ROI

Interesting ! Let’s investigate more formally a potential association of cortical thickness with age in young adults.

Creating and fitting a statistical model

We will implement an ordinary least square (OLS) regression model. Before applying to all ROIs and correcting for multiple comparison, let’s test it on our previous ROI example.

For this purpose we use the Python statsmodels package. We can create a model formula {response} ~ {predictor} + {covariates} (similar to R) and passing it as an argument to the ols method before fitting our model. In addition of sex, we will use the total intra-cranial volume (TIV) as covariate.

import statsmodels.api as sm
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf

response = 'G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Ant'
predictor = 'age'
hemi = 'lh'
hemi_df = fs_all_df[fs_all_df['hemi']==hemi]
covariates = 'eTIV + C(sex)'
# Fit regression model
results = smf.ols(f"{response} ~ {predictor} + {covariates}", data=hemi_df).fit()

we can now look at the results to check for variance explained and statistical significance.

results.summary()
OLS Regression Results
Dep. Variable:	G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Ant	R-squared:	0.060
Model:	OLS	Adj. R-squared:	0.047
Method:	Least Squares	F-statistic:	4.728
Date:	Thu, 03 Jun 2021	Prob (F-statistic):	0.00322
Time:	02:41:24	Log-Likelihood:	62.682
No. Observations:	226	AIC:	-117.4
Df Residuals:	222	BIC:	-103.7
Df Model:	3		
Covariance Type:	nonrobust		

              coef	    std err	     t	    P>|t|	    [0.025	0.975]
Intercept     3.2906	     0.183	     17.954	  0.000	    2.929	    3.652
C(sex)[T.M]  -0.0097	   0.033	    -0.296	  0.768	   -0.074	    0.055
age          -0.0258	   0.007	    -3.706	  0.000	   -0.040	   -0.012
eTIV          1.612e-08	 7.58e-08	 0.213	    0.832	   -1.33e-07	1.66e-07

Omnibus:	2.038	Durbin-Watson:	2.123
Prob(Omnibus):	0.361	Jarque-Bera (JB):	1.683
Skew:	-0.157	Prob(JB):	0.431
Kurtosis:	3.282	Cond. No.	2.03e+07

Rapid statistical interpretation

Can you provide one sentence summarizing the results of the OLS model regarding cortical thickness and age ?

To apply the model to all the ROIs, we use the same code as before but within a for loop. Note that a custom function format_ols_results has been created to save the results from the previous output in a dataframe.

# OLS result df
ols_df = pd.DataFrame()
predictor = 'age'
covariates = 'eTIV + C(sex)'
for hemi in ['lh','rh']:
    hemi_df = fs_all_df[fs_all_df['hemi']==hemi]
    for response in roi_cols:
        res = smf.ols(f"{response} ~ {predictor} + {covariates}", data=hemi_df).fit()
        res_df = format_ols_results(res)
        res_df['response'] = response
        res_df['hemi'] = hemi
        ols_df = ols_df.append(res_df)
ols_df
          index          coef       std err       t  P>|t|        [0.025        0.975]        R2  \
0     Intercept  2.481300e+00  2.210000e-01  11.239  0.000  2.046000e+00  2.916000e+00  0.004184   
1   C(sex)[T.M] -7.200000e-03  3.900000e-02  -0.182  0.856 -8.500000e-02  7.100000e-02  0.004184   
2           age -7.700000e-03  8.000000e-03  -0.921  0.358 -2.400000e-02  9.000000e-03  0.004184   
3          eTIV  1.781000e-08  9.140000e-08   0.195  0.846 -1.620000e-07  1.980000e-07  0.004184   
0     Intercept  2.593400e+00  1.650000e-01  15.732  0.000  2.269000e+00  2.918000e+00  0.018302   
..          ...           ...           ...     ...    ...           ...           ...       ...   
3          eTIV  4.495000e-08  4.820000e-08   0.933  0.352 -5.000000e-08  1.400000e-07  0.075192   
0     Intercept  3.044100e+00  2.870000e-01  10.589  0.000  2.478000e+00  3.611000e+00  0.040983   
1   C(sex)[T.M] -8.830000e-02  5.100000e-02  -1.718  0.087 -1.900000e-01  1.300000e-02  0.040983   
2           age -2.590000e-02  1.100000e-02  -2.370  0.019 -4.700000e-02 -4.000000e-03  0.040983   
3          eTIV  1.439000e-07  1.190000e-07   1.210  0.228 -9.050000e-08  3.780000e-07  0.040983  

We correct the results for multiple comparison with Bonferonni correction before plotting.

predictors = ['age']
all_rois_df = ols_df[ols_df['index'].isin(predictors)]
# Multiple comparison correction
n_comparisons = 2 * len(roi_cols) # 2 hemispheres
alpha = 0.05
alpha_corr = 0.05 / n_comparisons
# Get significant ROIs and hemis
sign_rois = all_rois_df[all_rois_df['P>|t|'] < alpha_corr]['response'].values
sign_hemis = all_rois_df[all_rois_df['P>|t|'] < alpha_corr]['hemi'].values
# Printing correction properties and results
print(f"Bonferroni correction with {n_comparisons} multiple comparisons")
print(f'Using corrected alpha threshold of {alpha_corr:5.4f}')
print("Significant ROIs:")
print(list(zip(sign_rois, sign_hemis)))
Bonferroni correction with 148 multiple comparisons
Using corrected alpha threshold of 0.0003
Significant ROIs:
[('G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Ant', 'lh'), ('G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Post', 'lh'), ('G_front_inf_Opercular', 'lh'), ('G_front_middle', 'lh'), ('G_front_sup', 'lh'), ('G_occipital_middle', 'lh'), ('G_temp_sup_G_T_transv', 'lh'), ('S_circular_insula_sup', 'lh'), ('S_front_middle', 'lh'), ('S_front_sup', 'lh'), ('S_parieto_occipital', 'lh'), ('S_precentral_sup_part', 'lh'), ('S_temporal_sup', 'lh'), ('G_and_S_cingul_Mid_Post', 'rh'), ('G_cuneus', 'rh'), ('G_front_inf_Triangul', 'rh'), ('G_front_middle', 'rh'), ('G_front_sup', 'rh'), ('G_pariet_inf_Angular', 'rh'), ('G_precentral', 'rh'), ('G_rectus', 'rh'), ('G_temporal_middle', 'rh'), ('S_circular_insula_sup', 'rh'), ('S_front_sup', 'rh')]

We plot the p-values on a log scale, indicating both the non-corrected and corrected alpha level.

g = sns.catplot(x='P>|t|', y='response', kind='bar', hue='index', col='hemi', data=all_rois_df)
g.set(xscale='log', xlim=(1e-5,2))
for ax in g.axes.flat:
    ax.axvline(alpha, ls='--',c='tomato')
    ax.axvline(alpha_corr, ls='--',c='darkred')

Cortical thickness vs age - p values

And the adjusted R-squared

g = sns.catplot(x='R2_adj', y='response', col='hemi', kind='bar', data=all_rois_df)

Cortical thickness vs age - adjusted R squared

Finally we can plot the t-scores on a mesh for global brain results visualization.

First we import the Destrieux mesh and labels from nilearn.

# Retrieve both the Destrieux atlas and labels
destrieux_atlas = datasets.fetch_atlas_surf_destrieux()
parcellation = destrieux_atlas['map_left']
labels = destrieux_atlas['labels']
labels = [l.decode('utf-8') for l in labels]
# Retrieve fsaverage5 surface dataset for the plotting background.
fsaverage = datasets.fetch_surf_fsaverage()

Then we a create a statistical map containing one t-score value for each ROI of the mesh. Because the ROI labels are not identical between Freesurfer and nilearn, we use a custom function map_fs_names_to_nilearn to convert them.

### Assign a t-score to each surface atlas ROI
stat_map_lh = np.zeros(parcellation.shape[0], dtype=int)
nilearn_stats_lh, nilearn_stats_rh = map_fs_names_to_nilearn(all_rois_df, new2old_roinames)
# For left hemisphere
for roi, t_stat in nilearn_stats_lh.items():
    stat_labels = np.where(parcellation == labels.index(roi))[0]
    stat_map_lh[stat_labels] = t_stat
# For right hemisphere
stat_map_rh = np.zeros(parcellation.shape[0], dtype=int)
for roi, t_stat in nilearn_stats_rh.items():
    stat_labels = np.where(parcellation == labels.index(roi))[0]
    stat_map_rh[stat_labels] = t_stat

Finally we plot the results with nilearn plot_surf_roi function.

# Lateral view of left hemisphere
plotting.plot_surf_roi(fsaverage['pial_left'], roi_map=stat_map_lh, hemi='left', view='lateral', 
                       bg_map=fsaverage['sulc_left'], bg_on_data=True);
# Medial view of right hemisphere
plotting.plot_surf_roi(fsaverage['pial_right'], roi_map=stat_map_rh, hemi='right', view='medial',
                       bg_map=fsaverage['sulc_right'], bg_on_data=True);

Cortical thickness vs age - surface t values on left hemi

Cortical thickness vs age - surface t values on right hemi

Statistical analysis: local GM changes assessed with Voxel Based Morphometry (VBM)

Relying on an atlas to identify and characterize brain changes or/and group differences is a common practice. While it offers more statistical power by limiting the comparisons to a limited set of regions, it introduces bias (the results depend on the choice of atlases) and may miss out on differences limited to a subregion within ROI. Voxel Based Morphometry (VBM) is a technique purely data-driven to detect changes at voxel level.

VBM aims at investigating each voxel independently across a group of subjects. This is a so called mass-univariate analysis: the analysis is done voxel by voxel and then multiple comparison correction is applied. In order to compare a given voxel across subjects, an assumption is that the voxel is at the same position in the subjects’ brain. This assumption is met by registering all maps of interest to a template. The maps investigated are often GM probability maps interpreted as local GM volume (as in this episode).

The comparaison requires first a correction for the transformation to the template space (called modulation), and then a mass-univariate statistical approach. We will examine the VBM workflow step by step. We will run the steps on a limited subset of 10 sujects from our 226 subjects cohort in a subset directory, while loading the corresponding cohort pre-computed results in the all_subjects directory.

VBM processing

Template creation

How to create a template ?

We want to create a template on which to align the GM probability maps of all our subjects. Do you have an idea on how to create this templa?

Hint

You can have a look at the outputs generated by smriprep/fmriprep.

One answer to the template challenge is to use the probability maps GM10_probamp_files created in MNI space by smriprep/fmriprep with the MNI152NLin2009cAsym template. A simple template can be obtained by averaging all these maps. Note that it is common to create a symmetric by template by average two mirror versions. We are not doing this in this episode.

# Define subset and cohort dirs
vbm_subset_dir = os.path.join(vbm_dir, "subset")
vbm_cohort_dir = os.path.join(vbm_dir, "all_subjects")
from nilearn.image import concat_imgs, mean_img
# For demonstration create template for subset
GM10_probmaps_4D_img = concat_imgs(GM10_probmap_files)
GM10_probmap_mean_img = mean_img(GM10_probmaps_4D_img)
GM10_probmap_mean_img.to_filename(os.path.join(vbm_dir, "GM10.nii.gz"))
# For the real application load corresponding template for the cohort
GM226_probmap_mean_img = nib.load(os.path.join(vbm_cohort_dir, "GM226.nii.gz"))

We will need to register all our subject native probability GM map to the template. The resulting template is 1mm-resolution but computation performance is increased if the template has a lower resolution, and our statistical analysis will require smoothing the data in any case. As a result we will resample the template to 2mm.

from nilearn.datasets import load_mni152_template
from nilearn.image import resample_to_img
template = load_mni152_template()
# Apply to our subset
GM10_probmap_mean_img_2mm = resample_to_img(GM10_probmap_mean_img, template)
GM10_probmap_mean_img_2mm.to_filename(os.path.join(vbm_dir, "GM10_2mm.nii.gz"))
# Load for the whole cohort
GM226_probmap_mean_img_2mm = nib.load(os.path.join(vbm_cohort_dir, "GM226_2mm.nii.gz"))

We can plot the results to look at the effect of group size and resolution on the templates.

n_plots,n_cols  = 4, 2
### Plot 1 mm templates
# Subset 10
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 1)
plt.imshow(GM10_probmap_mean_img.get_fdata()[:, :, 100], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)
# Cohort 256
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 2)
plt.imshow(GM226_probmap_mean_img.get_fdata()[:, :, 100], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)
### Plot 2 mm templates
# Subset 10
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 3)
plt.imshow(GM10_probmap_mean_img_2mm.get_fdata()[:, :, 47], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)
# Cohort 256
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 4)
plt.imshow(GM226_probmap_mean_img_2mm.get_fdata()[:, :, 47], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)

VBM template creation

Transformation correction, aka modulation

To compare GM values after transformation to the template space, they need to be modulated. Indeed, if a region in the space the subject expands when transformed to the template space, the intensity values must be corrected to account for the actually smaller original volume. This correction can be performed using the ratio between the template local volume and the corresponding original local volume. The amount of transformation is measured in each voxel by the Jacobian determinant J. So the modulation consists in multiplying or dividing by J according to how it is defined by the transformation software(template volume / local volume, or local volume / template volume).

In our case we run the FSL fnirt non-linear transform utility with the code below.

NATIVE_GM_MAPS=(data/derivatives/fmriprep/sub-*/anat/sub-+([0-9])_label-GM_probseg.nii.gz)
for GM_MAP in ${NATIVE_GM_MAPS[@]}; do 
    SUBJ_NAME=${GM_MAP%%_label*}
    fsl_reg ${GM_MAP} GM226_2mm.nii.gz \
            data/derivatives/vbm/subset/${SUBJ_NAME}/${SUBJ_NAME}_space-GM226_label-GM_probseg \
            -fnirt "--config=GM_2_MNI152GM_2mm.cnf \
            --jout=data/derivatives/vbm/subset/${SUBJ_NAME}/${SUBJ_NAME}_J"
done

For FSL the Jacobian determinant output is less than 1 if the original volume expands when warped to the template, and greater than 1 when it contracts.

Jupyter notebook challenge

Considering the definition of J output by FSL. In place of the question mark (?), what should be in the code below the mathematical operator applied to the warped GM map to correct for expansion / contraction in the notebook code: +, -, * or / ?

for subj_name in subj_names:
    # Get GM probability map in template space
    warped_GM_file = os.path.join(subj_dir, f"{subj_name}_space-GM226_label-GM_probseg.nii.gz")
    warped_GM = nib.load(warped_GM_file)
    # Get scaling factors (trace of Jacobian)
    J_map_file = os.path.join(subj_dir, f"{subj_name}_J.nii.gz")
    J_map = nib.load(J_map_file)
    # Compute modulated map
    modulated_map = math_img("img1 ? img2", img1=warped_GM, img2=J_map)
    # Save modulated image
    modulated_map_file = os.path.join(subj_dir, f"{subj_name}_space-GM226_label-GM_mod.nii.gz")
    modulated_map.to_filename(modulated_map_file)

We can plot all the intermediary steps leading to the modulated maps for two subjects of our cohort.

subs = [1, 2]
n_sub = len(subs)
n_plots, n_cols = 5*n_sub, n_sub
i_slice_match = {1: 50, 2: 52}
for i_sub, sub in enumerate(subs):
    ### Original image
    plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, (i_sub+1))
    GM_native_probmap_file = GM_native_probmap_files[sub]
    GM_native_probmap = nib.load(GM_native_probmap_file)
    GM_native_probmap_2mm = resample_to_img(GM_native_probmap, template)
    i_slice = i_slice_match[sub]
    plt.imshow(GM_native_probmap_2mm.get_fdata()[:, :, i_slice], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1.3)
    ### Template
    plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, (i_sub+1)+1*n_sub)
    plt.imshow(GM226_probmap_mean_img_2mm.get_fdata()[:, :, 47], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1.3)
    plt.title('Template')
    plt.colorbar();
    # Jacobian
    plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, (i_sub+1)+2*n_sub)
    log_ticks = np.logspace(-0.4, 0.4, 10)
    plt.imshow(J_10maps_4D.get_fdata()[:, :, 47, sub], origin="lower", norm=LogNorm())
    # Warped image
    plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, (i_sub+1)+3*n_sub)
    plt.imshow(warped_10maps_4D.get_fdata()[:, :, 47, sub], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1.3)
    # Subset 10
    plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, (i_sub+1)+4*n_sub)
    plt.imshow(modulated_10maps_4D.get_fdata()[:, :, 47, sub], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1.3)

VBM template creation

To look at the effect of group size and resolution we can look at the mean warped images for each combination of group size / resolution.

n_plots, n_cols = 6, 2
### Plot GM warped maps
# Subset 10
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 1)
plt.imshow(warped_10maps_mean.get_fdata()[:, :, 47], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)
# Cohort 256
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 2)
plt.imshow(warped_226maps_mean.get_fdata()[:, :, 47], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)
### Plot Jacobian maps
# Subset 10
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 3)
plt.imshow(np.log(J_10maps_mean.get_fdata()[:, :, 47]), origin="lower", vmin=-0.5, vmax=0.5)
# Cohort 256
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 4)
plt.imshow(np.log(J_226maps_mean.get_fdata()[:, :, 47]), origin="lower", vmin=-0.5, vmax=0.5)
### Plot GM modulated maps
# Subset 10
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 5)
plt.imshow(modulated_10maps_mean.get_fdata()[:, :, 47], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)
# Cohort 256
plt.subplot(n_plots, n_cols, 6)
plt.imshow(modulated_226maps_mean.get_fdata()[:, :, 47], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)

VBM mean warped maps

Creation of a GM mask

To limit our analysis to GM voxels, a GM mask is useful. We can create it according to the mean modulated GM maps (or e.g. mean GM probabilistic maps), and setting a treshold. In our case we choose a modulation value of at least 0.05 in the group average to be included in the analysis.

GM_mask = math_img('img > 0.05', img=modulated_226maps_mean)
GM_mask.to_filename(os.path.join(vbm_dir, "GM226_mask.nii.gz"))

The resulting GM maps cover a large extent of the brain:

plt.imshow(GM_mask.get_fdata()[:, :, 50], origin="lower", vmin=0, vmax=1)

VBM mean warped maps

Now that we have the modulated GM maps all aligned, we can carry out the statistical analysis.

VBM statistical analysis

For the VBM statistical analysis, we implement a two-level GLM model. While it is too long to cover in details in this episode, we can explain it briefly.

Principles

Consider a single voxel. The GLM model consists in:

  1. At subject level, evaluating the beta parameters (aka regression coefficients) in our model. Our model having:
    • Modulated GM as response / predicted variable
    • Age and sex as predictors (with sex as a covariate)
  2. At group level, indicating what is the combination of model parameters we want to assess for a significant effect. In our case we just want to look at the age beta paramater value across subjects. It is signicantly positive ? Significantly negative ? Not significantly negative or positive ?

Design matrix

The first step consists in defining a design matrix, this is a matrix with all our predictors/regressors. In our case this is a column for age, a column for sex, and for an intercept (a constant value).

# For the cohort including all subjects
design_matrix = subjects_info[["participant_id", "age", "sex"]].set_index("participant_id")
design_matrix = pd.get_dummies(design_matrix, columns=["sex"], drop_first=True)
design_matrix["intercept"] = 1
design_matrix
                  age  sex_M  intercept
participant_id                         
sub-0001        25.50      1          1
sub-0002        23.25      0          1
sub-0003        25.00      0          1
sub-0004        20.00      0          1
sub-0005        24.75      1          1
...               ...    ...        ...
sub-0222        22.00      0          1
sub-0223        20.75      0          1
sub-0224        21.75      1          1
sub-0225        20.25      0          1
sub-0226        20.00      1          1
# For the subset of 10 subjects
dm10 = design_matrix.iloc[:10]
dm10
                  age  sex_M  intercept
participant_id                         
sub-0001        25.50      1          1
sub-0002        23.25      0          1
sub-0003        25.00      0          1
sub-0004        20.00      0          1
sub-0005        24.75      1          1
sub-0006        23.75      1          1
sub-0007        19.25      0          1
sub-0008        21.00      1          1
sub-0009        24.75      0          1
sub-0010        24.75      1          1

To avoid having noisy data which does not satify the GLM statistical criteria (gaussianity of residuals) it is common to smooth the input maps. A smooth operation is included when implement our model next.

Second level GLM

The second step consists in defining what is the linear combination of [age_beta_parameter, sex_beta_parameter, intercept] we want to examine. In our case we want to look only at age, so our linear combination is simply 1 * age_parameter + 0 * sex_parameter + 0 * intercept. This is defined by what is called a contrast, which is then [1, 0, 0] in our case.

These two steps can be implemented with the SecondLevelModel python object of the nilearn glm module. We can use the fit method of a SecondLevelModel object on a design matrix to compute all the beta parameters for each subject. Then we can call the compute_contrast method with our contrast to assess if GM local volume is signicantly associated with age.

For our subset of subjects the corresponding Python code is as follows:

from nilearn.glm.second_level import SecondLevelModel

# First level of the two-level GLM
level2_glm10 = SecondLevelModel(smoothing_fwhm=3.0, mask_img=GM_mask)
level2_glm10.fit(modulated_10map_files, design_matrix=dm10)
# Second level of the two-level
contrast = [1, 0, 0]
zmap10 = level2_glm10.compute_contrast(second_level_contrast=contrast, output_type='z_score')

For the cohort we can simply load the associated z-score map.

zmap226_file = os.path.join(vbm_dir, "zmap_raw_GM226_age.nii.gz")
zmap226 = nib.load(zmap226_file)

from nilearn.glm import threshold_stats_img from nilearn.reporting import make_glm_report from nilearn.plotting import plot_stat_map

Finally, do not forget we are looking at a massive collection of voxels. Because we carry out so many statistical tests (one for each voxel), it is crucial we correct for multiple comparison. We can do so with nilearn threshold_stats_img function.

For the subset of subjects

zmap10_thr, z10thr = threshold_stats_img(zmap10, mask_img=GM_mask, alpha=.05, 
                                       height_control='fpr', cluster_threshold=50)

For the whole cohort

zmap226_file = os.path.join(vbm_dir, "zmap_raw_GM226_age.nii.gz")
zmap226 = nib.load(zmap226_file)

We can visualize the results on the cohort either interactively (with an arbitrary cluster threshold for visualization):

zmap226_thr, z226thr = threshold_stats_img(zmap226, mask_img=GM_mask, alpha=.05, 
                                        height_control='fpr', cluster_threshold=50)

VBM mean warped maps

Or with a static plot (no cluster threshold)

plotting.plot_stat_map(zmap226, threshold=zthr, colorbar=True, display_mode='z');

VBM mean warped maps

Key Points

  • Multiple volumetric and surface metrics exist to characterize brain structure morphology

  • Both conventional statistical models and specific neuroimaging approaches can be used

  • Caution should be exercised at both data inspection and model interpretation levels


sMRI Analysis: Reproducibility Considerations

Overview

Teaching: 20 min
Exercises: 10 min
Questions
  • How sensitive are the findings to your MR pipeline parameters?

Objectives
  • Understand impact of software and atlas choices

You Are Here!

course_flow

MR image processing pipeline selection choices

Example software analysis

Task: compare cortical thickness between FreeSurfer and CIVET

Drawing

Note: See this for details on brain plots

Correlation between thickness measurements:

Software: FreeSurfer (v5.1, v5.3, v6.0), CIVET (2.1) and ANTs

Parcellation: DKT

Drawing

Possible choices for FreeSurfer parcellations

Different parcellation different results?

Inference pertaining to neuroantomical differences and/or prediction models based on individual neuroanatomical feature sets can be sensitive to parcellation choice.

Drawing

Note: Image adopted from Madan 2021

Key Points

  • It is crucial to assess biological vs methodological variation in your findings to avoid reproducibility crisis.